Skip to main content

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Ann Brown D/B/A Jay Construction

Tex. App.—4th Dist.December 19, 2018No. 04-17-00788-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Jay Construction (defendant) on all of Union Pacific's claims. The appellate court affirmed, finding the indemnity provision void under the Texas Anti-Indemnity Act and Union Pacific's claims barred as a matter of law.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Ann Brown D/B/A Jay Construction** This case involved a dispute between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Ann Brown, who operated a business called Jay Construction. The case was filed in a Texas appeals court in December 2018 and involved employment law issues. However, the specific details about what sparked the disagreement between the railroad company and the construction business owner are not available in the court records. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning cannot be determined from the available information. The case outcome and any legal conclusions reached by the judges remain unclear based on the incomplete court documentation. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific issues or outcome of this case, it's difficult to draw clear lessons for workers. However, this case highlights that employment law disputes can arise between large corporations like railroad companies and smaller business operators. Workers should be aware that employment-related legal conflicts can involve various parties beyond just traditional employer-employee relationships, potentially including contractors and subcontractors. When facing workplace legal issues, workers benefit from understanding that employment law covers a broad range of working relationships and situations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.