Skip to main content

Matter of Benjamin v. New York City Employees Retirement Sys.

N.Y. App. Div.March 6, 2019No. Index No. 7222/15
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Appellate Division reversed the lower court, holding that NYCERS properly excluded the petitioner's CUNY adjunct lecturer earnings from his final average salary calculation because that employment did not qualify as 'city-service' under the Administrative Code.

What This Ruling Means

**Benjamin v. New York City Employees Retirement System - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Benjamin and the New York City Employees Retirement System (NYCERS), which manages pension benefits for city workers. While the specific details of Benjamin's complaint aren't provided in the available information, the case dealt with employment-related issues involving the retirement system. The case went to New York's appellate court in March 2019, but the specific outcome of the court's decision is not detailed in the available records. The appellate court reviewed whatever lower court decision had been made previously, but we don't know whether they upheld, reversed, or modified that earlier ruling. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case highlights the importance of understanding your pension and retirement benefits as a public employee. Workers should know that disputes with retirement systems can be taken to court when necessary. If you're a New York City employee or work for any employer with a pension system, it's important to stay informed about your retirement benefits, keep good records of your contributions and service time, and know that you have legal options if problems arise with your pension or retirement benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.