Skip to main content

Raland Tuttle and 1st JaRay, Ltd. v. Eduardo Builes and B&A Laboratories, Inc. D/B/A Xenco Laboratories, Inc.

Tex. App.—11th Dist.March 21, 2019No. 11-17-00096-CVCited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed on breach of contract claims; trial court awarded damages for unpaid rent during holdover period at $1,200/month reasonable rental value, totaling $63,000 after crediting partial payment, but reversed on attorney's fees issue on appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a business dispute between Raland Tuttle and his company 1st JaRay against Eduardo Builes and his laboratory company, Xenco Laboratories. The main issue was a broken contract related to rental payments. Xenco Laboratories had been renting space but failed to pay the agreed-upon rent, continuing to occupy the property without making required payments during what's called a "holdover period" - essentially staying past their lease terms. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of Tuttle and 1st JaRay, finding that Xenco Laboratories had indeed breached their contract by not paying rent. The court awarded $63,000 in damages, calculating this based on a reasonable rental value of $1,200 per month for the time period when rent went unpaid. The court did give Xenco credit for any partial payments they had made. However, on appeal, the court reversed the decision about attorney's fees. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this case primarily involved business-to-business contracts rather than employment issues, it demonstrates how courts enforce contract obligations and calculate damages when agreements are broken. Workers can take comfort knowing that courts take contract breaches seriously and will award compensation for unpaid amounts owed under valid agreements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.