Skip to main content

Secretary of Labor v. Walmart Stores East

8th CircuitMarch 28, 2019No. 17-2647Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Colloton, Beam, Grasz
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the OSHA citations against Walmart for failing to provide hepatitis B vaccinations to SIRT team members in accordance with bloodborne pathogen regulations, denying Walmart's petition for review.

What This Ruling Means

# Secretary of Labor v. Walmart Stores East **What Happened** The federal government's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Walmart for failing to provide hepatitis B vaccinations to its SIRT team members. These employees work with bloodborne pathogens—disease-causing materials in blood—and federal safety rules require employers to offer this protective vaccination to such workers at no cost. **What the Court Decided** The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld OSHA's citations against Walmart. The court agreed that Walmart violated bloodborne pathogen regulations by not providing the hepatitis B vaccine to workers who needed it. Walmart's request to overturn the decision was denied. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that employers must provide vaccinations and safety protections to workers exposed to bloodborne pathogens. Employees in healthcare, cleaning, and other at-risk jobs have a legal right to this protection. The decision strengthens workers' ability to hold employers accountable when safety standards are ignored.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.