Skip to main content

Forbes v. Showmann, Inc.

Ohio Ct. App.June 14, 2019No. C-180325Cited 1 time
Defendant WinShowmann, Inc
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Mock
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Excerpt

CONTRACTS – CONVERSION – R.C. 4113.15: The trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of defendant employer on plaintiff former employee's breach-of-contract claim, because no contract was created due to a lack of consideration where the employer had gifted a raffle ticket to the former employee while she was still in its employ to enter an employer-sponsored raffle for a cruise package, which she won. The trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of defendant employer on plaintiff former employee's claim alleging a violation of Ohio's Prompt Pay Act where the prize associated with the former employee's winning raffle ticket did not meet the definition of a "fringe benefit" as set forth in R.C. 4113.15(D). The trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of defendant employer on plaintiff former employee's conversion claim on the basis that the former employee did not have a right to possess the prize attached to the winning raffle ticket because she had not fulfilled the condition that she still be employed by the employer when she took the cruise, which the employer alleged was attached to the gift of the raffle ticket for the cruise package, because there remained a genuine issue of material fact as to what conditions, if any, were attached to the gift of the raffle ticket.

What This Ruling Means

# Forbes v. Showmann, Inc. - Case Summary **What Happened** An employee named Forbes won a cruise package in a company-sponsored raffle. The employer had given her a raffle ticket as a gift while she was working there. After she left the company, Forbes sued, claiming the employer had broken a contract by not giving her the prize. **What the Court Decided** The Ohio court ruled in favor of the employer. The judge determined that no binding contract existed because the raffle ticket was simply a gift. For a legal contract to exist, both sides must exchange something of value. Since the employer just gave away the ticket without Forbes agreeing to anything in return, there was no contract to break. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that gifts or prizes from employers—like raffle tickets—are generally not legally binding promises. Workers cannot sue to enforce them as if they were official contracts. If an employer wants to guarantee a prize, they need to create a clear, written agreement that both sides sign. Otherwise, workplace giveaways remain voluntary gestures without legal protection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.