Skip to main content

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ingredion Inc.

D.C. CircuitJuly 19, 2019No. 18-1155; C/w 18-1244Cited 15 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, Srinivasan, Wilkins
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court denied Ingredion's petition for review and enforced the NLRB's order finding violations of the National Labor Relations Act, including unfair labor practices related to direct dealing with employees, denigration of the union, unilateral implementation of terms, and failure to timely respond to information requests.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Ingredion Incorporated, a manufacturing company, was accused of violating workers' rights under federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that Ingredion committed several unfair labor practices, including bypassing the union to deal directly with employees, making negative comments about the union, changing workplace terms without negotiating with the union first, and failing to provide requested information to union representatives in a timely manner. **What the Court Decided** Ingredion challenged the NLRB's findings in court, but the appeals court sided with the NLRB. The court denied Ingredion's petition and enforced the labor board's order, confirming that the company had violated the National Labor Relations Act through these unfair labor practices. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces important protections for unionized workers. It confirms that employers cannot bypass unions to negotiate directly with employees, must respect the union's role as the workers' representative, and cannot unilaterally change working conditions without proper negotiation. The decision also emphasizes that employers must cooperate with unions by providing requested information promptly, ensuring transparency in the bargaining process.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.