Skip to main content

First Student, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

D.C. CircuitSeptember 3, 2019No. 18-1091; C/w 18-1153Cited 3 times
Defendant WinFirst Student, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, Wilkins, Silberman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The appellate court denied First Student's petition for review and granted enforcement of the NLRB's order finding First Student was a 'perfectly clear' successor employer that violated the NLRA by unilaterally changing terms and conditions of employment without bargaining with the incumbent union.

What This Ruling Means

# First Student, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board **What Happened** First Student, a transportation company, took over operations from another company. The workers at this location were represented by a union that had negotiated a contract with the previous employer. First Student changed the workers' pay, benefits, and working conditions without discussing these changes with the union first. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against First Student. The judges found that First Student was a "successor employer"—meaning it was continuing the same business and took responsibility for the previous employer's obligations. Because First Student made major changes to employment terms without bargaining with the union, it violated federal labor law (the National Labor Relations Act). **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers when companies change hands. When a new employer takes over operations, it cannot simply ignore existing union agreements or make unilateral changes to working conditions. New employers must negotiate with unions before altering pay, benefits, or job terms. This prevents workers from losing negotiated protections during ownership transitions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.