Skip to main content

Few v. Laborers District Council Pension & Disability Trust Fund No. 2

D.D.C.September 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-1669
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Amit P. Mehta
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies required under ERISA before filing suit, as he did not dispute his pension benefit payment through the fund's established procedures.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Loses Pension Case for Skipping Required Steps** This case involved a worker named Few who believed his pension fund owed him money and filed a lawsuit claiming wage theft against the Laborers District Council Pension & Disability Trust Fund No. 2. Few apparently thought he wasn't receiving the correct pension benefits he had earned. The court dismissed Few's case entirely. The judge ruled that Few jumped straight to filing a lawsuit without first going through the pension fund's own complaint process. Under federal law (ERISA), workers must use their pension plan's internal dispute procedures before they can sue in court. Few failed to file a formal complaint with the pension fund or follow their established steps for challenging benefit payments. **What this means for workers:** If you have problems with your pension or retirement benefits, you can't immediately go to court. You must first file a complaint through your pension plan's official process and give them a chance to resolve the issue. Only after you've completed those steps and still disagree with the outcome can you file a lawsuit. Skipping this requirement will get your case thrown out, even if you have a valid complaint about your benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.