Skip to main content

Unite Here Local 11 v. NLRB

9th CircuitOctober 23, 2019No. 18-70144
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit denied the union's petition for review, upholding the NLRB's interpretation that a 2006 remedial order did not require retroactive restoration of payments to the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Welfare Fund.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Unite Here Local 11, a union representing hotel and restaurant workers, had a dispute with the Smoke House Restaurant over payments to a worker welfare fund. In 2006, there had been a previous court order requiring the restaurant to make certain payments to the union's welfare fund, which provides benefits like health insurance to workers. The union believed this 2006 order meant the restaurant should have been making payments going back to an earlier date and owed back payments. The union asked the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to enforce this interpretation, but the NLRB disagreed. **What the Court Decided** The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and the restaurant. The court ruled that the 2006 remedial order did not require the restaurant to make retroactive payments to the welfare fund. This meant the restaurant did not owe the union any back payments for the earlier period. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows how important the specific language in court orders can be for workers' benefits. When unions negotiate welfare funds that provide health insurance and other benefits, the exact terms of any remedial orders matter greatly. Workers should understand that court orders may not always cover past periods unless explicitly stated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.