The Tax Court held that back pay recovered by the plaintiff in a Title VII job discrimination settlement is taxable income and cannot be excluded under section 104(a)(2) as personal injury damages. The entire $18,030.90 settlement amount was characterized as back pay, not compensatory damages for personal injuries.
Petitioner recovered $ 18,030.90, after expenses and attorneys' fees, in settlement of a job discrimination suit under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Petitioner reported half of that amount as income under sec. 61, I.R.C. 1954, and excluded the other half as personal injury damages under sec. 104(a)(2), I.R.C. 1954. Held, the entire amount recovered constitutes income under sec. 61, I.R.C. 1954.
Hodge v. Commissioner: What Workers Need to Know
What Happened
A worker filed a discrimination lawsuit against Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. under federal civil rights laws. The company settled the case and paid the worker $18,030.90. The worker then faced a tax question: should this settlement money be taxed as regular income, or could some of it be excluded from taxes as compensation for personal injury?
What the Court Decided
The Tax Court ruled that the entire settlement amount must be counted as taxable income. The court determined the money represented "back pay"—wages the worker would have earned if not for the discrimination. Back pay is treated as regular income for tax purposes, not as personal injury compensation.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling clarifies that when workers receive settlements for job discrimination, they should expect to pay taxes on that money. Workers should plan accordingly and consult with a tax professional before settling discrimination claims, since they won't be able to avoid taxes on back pay portions of settlements.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.