Skip to main content

Nasser Chehab v. First Service Credit Union

Tex. App.—14th Dist.September 3, 2020No. 14-18-00969-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

First Service Credit Union prevailed on summary judgment against all of Chehab's claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and DTPA violations. The appellate court affirmed, finding Chehab failed to establish recoverable damages, particularly for his claimed lost profits from a used car dealership business.

What This Ruling Means

**Chehab v. First Service Credit Union: Contract Dispute Outcome** Nasser Chehab sued his former employer, First Service Credit Union, claiming they broke their contract with him and violated their duty to treat him fairly. Chehab also alleged the credit union engaged in deceptive business practices. As part of his lawsuit, he sought money for lost profits he claimed he would have made from a used car dealership business. The court ruled entirely in favor of First Service Credit Union. The judge granted summary judgment, meaning the credit union won without going to trial because Chehab couldn't prove his case. When Chehab appealed, the higher court agreed with the original decision. The appeals court found that Chehab failed to show he suffered any recoverable financial damages, especially regarding his claimed lost profits from the car dealership business. This case highlights an important point for workers considering legal action against employers: you must be able to prove actual financial harm to win monetary damages. Simply claiming you lost potential income from other business ventures isn't enough—you need solid evidence of specific, measurable losses directly caused by your employer's actions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.