Skip to main content

Michalovic Crawley v. United States

Fed. Cl.December 17, 2020No. 19-371
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Circuit
Federal Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted unopposed motion for nationwide conditional FLSA collective action certification for VA Diagnostic Radiologic Technologists allegedly misclassified as exempt and denied overtime pay, and approved notice procedures.

Excerpt

REPORTED ORDER granting Unopposed Motion for Conditional Certification and Notice. Joint Status Report due by 1/8/2021. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (lb) Service on parties made. Keywords re Order on Motion, Reported Order: Fair Labor Standards Act 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) Conditional Certification

What This Ruling Means

**Court Allows Federal Workers to Join Together in Wage Lawsuit** This case involved federal employee Michalovic Crawley who filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs minimum wage and overtime pay. Crawley wanted to turn the case into a collective action, allowing other similarly affected federal workers to join the lawsuit together rather than filing separate individual cases. The court granted Crawley's request for "conditional certification," which means the judge agreed to let the case proceed as a group lawsuit. This allows other federal employees who believe they experienced similar wage and hour violations to join the case. The government did not oppose this request. The court ordered both sides to file a joint status report by January 8, 2021, to update the court on the case's progress. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling demonstrates that workers can band together to challenge wage violations, even when suing the federal government as their employer. Collective actions are often more practical and cost-effective for workers than individual lawsuits, especially for wage and hour claims. When courts allow these group cases to move forward, it gives workers more leverage to address workplace violations and potentially recover unpaid wages or overtime compensation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Michalovic Crawley v. United States from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.