Skip to main content

City of Spokane v. Department of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.May 12, 2000No. No. 23660-5-IICited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hunt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Court of Appeals affirmed the Department of Labor and Industries Director's determination that Wheelabrator must pay prevailing wages for annual maintenance shutdown work performed at the City-owned waste-to-energy facility under chapter 39.12 RCW.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules City Must Pay Prevailing Wages for Maintenance Work** This case involved a dispute over wage requirements at a waste-to-energy facility in Spokane. The city owned the facility but hired Wheelabrator Spokane, Inc. to operate it under contract. During annual maintenance shutdowns, workers performed various repair and maintenance tasks. The question was whether these workers had to be paid "prevailing wages" - the standard pay rates for similar work in the area, which are typically higher than regular wages. Initially, an administrative judge ruled that prevailing wage laws didn't apply to this maintenance work. However, the Washington Court of Appeals disagreed and reversed that decision. The court determined that because the facility was publicly owned, workers performing maintenance during shutdowns must be paid prevailing wages, even though a private company was managing the facility. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling protects workers on public projects by ensuring they receive fair, standardized pay rates. Even when private companies operate publicly-owned facilities, maintenance workers are still entitled to prevailing wage protections. This prevents contractors from underpaying workers on taxpayer-funded projects and helps maintain decent wage standards in the construction and maintenance industries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.