Skip to main content

Jones v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

La. Ct. App.June 14, 2017No. NO. 2016-CA-1168Cited 21 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Landrieu, Lobrano, Love
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the trial court's partial summary judgment finding GEICO liable for bad faith, held that GEICO was entitled to summary judgment on the bad faith claim as a matter of law, but found genuine issues of material fact regarding potential misrepresentation. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**Jones v. Government Employees Insurance Co. - What Workers Should Know** This case involved an employee who sued their employer, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), claiming the company acted in bad faith and made misrepresentations. The employee likely believed GEICO violated their duties as an employer through dishonest or unfair treatment. The appeals court made a mixed ruling. First, it overturned a lower court's decision that had found GEICO guilty of bad faith, determining that GEICO was not liable for bad faith as a matter of law. However, the appeals court found there were still unresolved questions about whether GEICO had misrepresented something to the employee. Because these factual disputes remained, the court sent the case back to the lower court for additional proceedings to resolve the misrepresentation claims. For workers, this case shows that bad faith claims against employers can be difficult to prove in court, even when a lower court initially sides with the employee. However, it also demonstrates that misrepresentation claims may have a better chance of success when there are factual disputes about what an employer told or promised an employee. Workers should carefully document any promises or statements made by their employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.