Skip to main content

Denson v. Dc Restaurant Holdings, Inc.

D.D.C.October 27, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-1609
Plaintiff WinDC Restaurant Holdings, Inc.$194,069.88 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Dabney L. Friedrich
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants for wage and hour violations. Plaintiff awarded $45,637.82 in unpaid wages plus $136,913.46 in treble liquidated damages under DC law, totaling $182,551.28, plus $11,207.60 in attorney's fees and $210.00 in costs.

What This Ruling Means

Denson v. DC Restaurant Holdings, Inc.

What Happened

An employee named Denson sued DC Restaurant Holdings, Inc. for wage theft—meaning the employer failed to pay wages that were legally owed. The defendant did not respond to the lawsuit or contest the claims in court.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled in Denson's favor by default judgment, finding that wage violations had occurred. The company was ordered to pay $45,637.82 in unpaid wages owed to the employee. Additionally, under DC law, the court tripled this amount as a penalty, awarding $136,913.46 in extra damages to punish the violation. The company also had to cover Denson's attorney fees ($11,207.60) and court costs ($210.00), bringing the total to $182,551.28.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case demonstrates that workers have legal protections against wage theft. DC law not only requires employers to pay owed wages but also penalizes them with triple damages when violations occur. Workers who aren't paid can pursue court action, and the employer may have to cover their legal fees, making it financially feasible to fight back.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.