Wills v. Ellsworth Motor Freightlines, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Hargrave, Hodges, Lavender, Simms, Summers, Kauger, Opala, Wilson
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- Appeal from Workers' Compensation Court En Banc affirming trial authority's order
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
Workers' Compensation Court affirmed that petitioner was an independent contractor rather than an employee, denying workers' compensation coverage despite claims of employment with Shamrock Coal Company.
Excerpt
Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Court En Banc. Petitioner sought review of order of the Workers' Compensation Court en banc affirming trial authority's order finding that petitioner was an independent contractor and denying workers' compensation coverage. Petitioner alleged that Ellsworth Motor Freightlines, Inc., was acting as his workers' compensation insurance carrier and that he was an employee of Shamrock Coal Company at the time of his injury. ORDER OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT EN BANC SUSTAINED.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.