Skip to main content

Court Ruling — 3rd Circuit, 1991 #566011

3rd CircuitSeptember 13, 1991No. 90-5690Cited 1 time
Mixed ResultCooper Electric Supply Co., Inc.$100,435 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
1710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed that Cooper Electric's inside salespersons were not exempt administrative employees and thus entitled to FLSA overtime pay. However, the court reversed the district court's denial of liquidated damages, finding Cooper liable for both unpaid wages and liquidated damages.

What This Ruling Means

**Cooper Electric Supply Co. Case Summary** This case involved a dispute over whether inside salespeople at Cooper Electric Supply Co. should receive overtime pay. The company classified these workers as "administrative employees," which would exempt them from overtime requirements under federal wage laws. The salespeople disagreed and sued, claiming they were entitled to overtime pay for hours worked beyond 40 per week. The court ruled in favor of the workers on the main issue, finding that Cooper Electric's inside salespeople were not truly administrative employees and therefore must receive overtime pay. The court also went further than the lower court had, ordering Cooper Electric to pay not only the unpaid overtime wages but also "liquidated damages" – essentially a penalty equal to the amount of unpaid wages. The total award was $100,435. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that companies cannot simply label employees as "administrative" to avoid paying overtime. Courts will look at what workers actually do, not just their job titles. It also demonstrates that employers who violate wage laws may face additional financial penalties beyond just paying the wages they owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.