Skip to main content

Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

Cal. Ct. App.January 26, 2011No. No. H034994Cited 28 times
Defendant WinHeritage Residential Care, Inc.$72,000 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McAdams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the Labor Commissioner's assessment of a $72,000 civil penalty against Heritage Residential Care for failing to provide itemized wage statements to employees, rejecting the employer's argument that the violations were inadvertent.

What This Ruling Means

**Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement** Heritage Residential Care, a company that provides care services, was caught not giving their employees proper wage statements. These statements are supposed to show workers detailed information about their pay, including hours worked, wages earned, and deductions taken. The California Labor Commissioner investigated and found that the company had violated wage statement requirements and imposed a $72,000 penalty. Heritage Residential Care appealed the decision, arguing that their violations were accidental mistakes rather than intentional wrongdoing. They hoped this would reduce or eliminate the penalty. The appellate court disagreed and upheld the full $72,000 penalty. The court ruled that it didn't matter whether the violations were intentional or accidental – the company still failed to follow the law requiring proper wage statements for employees. This ruling is important for workers because it shows that employers cannot avoid penalties by claiming their wage violations were just mistakes. Companies must provide detailed pay stubs showing exactly how workers' wages are calculated. When employers fail to do this, they face significant financial consequences regardless of their intentions. Workers have the right to understand exactly how their pay is determined.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.