Skip to main content

Astrada v. Archer

N.Y. App. Div.May 27, 2008Cited 8 times
Plaintiff WinArcher
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff on breach of contract, requiring the defendant to return the plaintiff's down payment plus statutory interest on a failed real property sale due to inability to obtain mortgage financing despite good-faith efforts.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a real estate transaction dispute between Astrada (the buyer) and Archer (the seller). Astrada had put down a deposit to purchase property from Archer but was unable to secure mortgage financing despite making good-faith efforts to obtain a loan. When the sale fell through due to financing issues, Astrada sued Archer to get the down payment back, claiming breach of contract. **What the Court Decided:** Both the trial court and appellate court ruled in favor of Astrada. The courts ordered Archer to return the full down payment plus statutory interest. The courts found that when a buyer makes genuine efforts to secure financing but cannot obtain a mortgage through no fault of their own, they are entitled to recover their deposit from the seller. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling protects buyers in real estate transactions who act in good faith but face financing challenges. For workers looking to purchase homes, this decision establishes that if you earnestly try to get a mortgage but are denied, you shouldn't lose your down payment. The requirement to pay interest also discourages sellers from wrongfully keeping deposits, providing additional financial protection for buyers during real estate transactions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.