Skip to main content

Robinson v. New Orleans Employers Ila AFL-CIO Pension Welfare Vacation & Holiday Funds

5th CircuitMarch 13, 2008No. 07-30433Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jolly, Dennis, Prado
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the Pension Fund, holding that the plaintiff was not a qualified surviving spouse because she was not legally married to the deceased participant on his retirement date in 1984, and that Louisiana does not recognize common law marriages.

What This Ruling Means

# Robinson v. New Orleans Employers ILA AFL-CIO Pension & Welfare Funds **What Happened** Robinson claimed she was entitled to survivor benefits from a pension fund after her long-time partner passed away. She argued she should receive these benefits as his surviving spouse, even though they were never formally married. She had lived with the deceased participant as his partner, but they never obtained a marriage license. **What the Court Decided** The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Robinson. The court determined that pension benefits for surviving spouses only go to people who are legally married. Since Robinson and the deceased were not legally married when he retired in 1984, she did not qualify as a surviving spouse. The court also confirmed that Louisiana, where this case was heard, does not recognize common law marriages (informal marriages without a license). **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that employer pension plans typically follow strict legal definitions of "spouse" for benefit purposes. Workers in long-term relationships without legal marriage should understand that they may not qualify for survivor benefits. Those concerned about family financial protection should consult with benefits administrators and consider formal marriage if pension or insurance benefits matter to them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.