Skip to main content

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCAL 350, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS, Defendant-Appellee

9th CircuitJuly 6, 1993No. 90-16810Cited 38 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fletcher, Poole, Brunetti
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationAge Discrimination

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment and held that the EEOC's age discrimination claim against Local 350's policy of barring retired union members from the hiring hall while receiving pensions was timely and viable under the ADEA, finding the policy facially discriminatory and a continuing violation.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Local 350, a plumbers and pipefitters union, claiming the union discriminated against workers. The EEOC argued that the union's practices violated employment discrimination laws, but a lower court dismissed the case. The EEOC appealed this decision to a higher court. **What the Court Decided** The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the union and upheld the dismissal. The court found that the EEOC did not provide enough evidence to prove that Local 350 actually discriminated against workers. Without sufficient proof of discrimination, the case could not move forward. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows how challenging it can be to prove discrimination cases, even when the EEOC brings the lawsuit. Workers who believe they've faced discrimination need strong evidence to support their claims. The case also demonstrates that unions, like employers, can face discrimination lawsuits if their practices appear to treat workers unfairly. For workers considering discrimination complaints, this highlights the importance of documenting incidents and gathering solid evidence before filing claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.