Skip to main content

Adam Spector v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co

3rd CircuitSeptember 29, 2011No. 10-4265Cited 7 times
Plaintiff WinFireman's Fund Insurance Company$104,432 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fisher, Hardiman, Greenaway
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The District Court awarded the Spectors $104,432 in damages for breach of contract on their homeowner's insurance claim for water damage. The appellate court affirmed this judgment except for the attorney's fees award.

What This Ruling Means

**Spector v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.** This case involved Adam Spector, who had a homeowner's insurance policy with Fireman's Fund Insurance Company. When Spector's home suffered water damage, he filed a claim with his insurance company. However, Fireman's Fund either denied the claim or failed to properly pay for the damages, leading Spector to sue the company for breaking their insurance contract and acting in bad faith. The court ruled in favor of Spector and his family. The trial court awarded them $104,432 in damages, finding that Fireman's Fund had indeed breached their insurance contract. When Fireman's Fund appealed the decision, the higher court upheld the damage award, though they did modify the portion about attorney's fees. This case matters for workers because many employees receive insurance benefits through their employers or purchase insurance to protect their assets. The ruling reinforces that insurance companies must honor their contractual obligations and pay valid claims. When insurers wrongfully deny or underpay claims, customers can successfully sue for damages. This provides important protection for workers who rely on insurance coverage for their homes and other valuable property.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.