Skip to main content

Walter Concrete Construction Corp. v. Lederle Laboratories

N.Y. App. Div.November 19, 2001Cited 1 time
Defendant WinLederle Laboratories$547,552.32 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of the third-party plaintiff (Fred L. Holt, Inc.) against the third-party defendant (International Fidelity Insurance Company) on a breach of contract claim regarding a performance bond, awarding $547,552.32.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, I cannot write a complete summary of this court case as requested. The excerpt is empty, and crucial details are missing including: - The specific employment law dispute between the parties - What the court actually decided (the outcome is listed as "unknown") - The legal reasoning behind any decision - What employment law issues were at stake To properly explain this case to workers, I would need: - A description of the actual employment dispute - The court's ruling and reasoning - Details about the employment law claims involved - How the decision affects worker rights The case title suggests it involved Walter Concrete Construction Corp. and Lederle Laboratories, and it was decided by a New York appellate court in 2001. However, without the actual court excerpt or case details, I cannot explain what happened, what the court decided, or why it would matter for workers. If you could provide the actual case excerpt or more details about the dispute and ruling, I would be happy to write a clear, plain-English summary for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.