Skip to main content

Cubler v. Trumark Financial Credit Union

PACTCOMPLPHILADApril 4, 2013No. No. 3135 EDA 2012
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tereshko
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

Trial court granted defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing plaintiff's complaint as untimely under the two-year statute of limitations for civil penalties. Appellate court affirmed, holding that statutory damages under Pennsylvania UCC § 9625(c)(2) and (e) are punitive in nature and therefore subject to the shorter limitations period rather than the six-year period.

What This Ruling Means

**Cubler v. Trumark Financial Credit Union: Employment Dispute** This case involved an employment-related legal dispute between an employee named Cubler and Trumark Financial Credit Union. The worker filed a lawsuit against the credit union in 2013, though the specific details of what prompted the legal action are not available from the court records provided. Unfortunately, the court documents available don't contain enough information to determine what the court ultimately decided in this case or what specific employment issues were at stake. The case was filed in a Philadelphia court, but the final outcome, reasoning, and any potential damages awarded remain unclear from the available records. **What This Means for Workers:** While the specifics of this case aren't known, it represents the type of employment disputes that can arise between workers and their employers. The fact that this case was filed shows that employees have legal options when they believe their workplace rights have been violated. Workers facing employment issues should know they can seek legal remedies through the court system, though outcomes vary greatly depending on the specific circumstances and applicable laws involved in each situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.