Skip to main content

Coastal International Security Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

5th CircuitApril 9, 2009No. 08-60347
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
King, Benavides, Clement
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the employer's petition for review and granted enforcement of the NLRB's order, finding that Coastal International Security violated the National Labor Relations Act by unilaterally changing trainee wages without bargaining with the union.

What This Ruling Means

**Coastal International Security Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2009)** **What Happened:** Coastal International Security, a security company, decided to change how much it paid trainees without discussing the change with the workers' union first. The company made this wage change on its own, ignoring the union that represented its employees. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) investigated and ruled that the company broke federal labor law by making this unilateral decision. **What the Court Decided:** The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB against Coastal International Security. The court upheld the NLRB's finding that the company violated the National Labor Relations Act by changing trainee wages without bargaining with the union. The court denied the company's request to overturn this ruling and ordered the company to follow the NLRB's corrective measures. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces an important right for unionized workers: employers cannot unilaterally change wages or working conditions without negotiating with the union first. When workers are represented by a union, employers must engage in collective bargaining before making changes that affect employees' pay or benefits. This decision strengthens workers' collective bargaining rights and ensures unions have meaningful input on workplace decisions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.