Skip to main content

State ex rel. Hemphill v. Ohio State Emp. Relations Bd.

Ohio Ct. App.June 30, 2022No. 21AP-469
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Klatt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Mandamus petition denied

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Mandamus petition denied. The State Employment Relations Board (SERB) properly dismissed the unfair labor practice charge as untimely filed beyond the 90-day limitations period and for lack of probable cause since the union had withdrawn its grievance.

Excerpt

Mandamus denied. SERB did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed ULP charge as untimely when the ULP charge was not filed until after the 90-day limitations period had expired. SERB did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed ULP charge for lack of probable cause when the information submitted to SERB indicated that the union had withdrawn the grievance and no longer sought arbitration.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Hemphill filed a complaint claiming their employer committed an unfair labor practice. However, they waited too long to file the complaint with Ohio's State Employment Relations Board (SERB) - submitting it after the required 90-day deadline had passed. Additionally, the union representing workers had already withdrawn their related grievance and stopped pursuing the matter through arbitration. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with SERB and upheld their decision to dismiss Hemphill's complaint. The court ruled that SERB acted properly when they threw out the case for two reasons: it was filed too late (beyond the 90-day time limit), and there wasn't enough evidence to support the claim since the union had already given up on the issue. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the critical importance of timing when filing workplace complaints. Workers have only 90 days to file unfair labor practice charges with SERB, and missing this deadline means losing the right to pursue the case entirely. The ruling also shows that if a union withdraws support for a grievance, it becomes much harder for individual workers to succeed with related complaints. Workers should act quickly when they believe their rights have been violated and stay informed about their union's actions on their behalf.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.