Skip to main content

Phillips v. Union Pacific Railroad

Ark. Ct. App.January 26, 2005No. CA 04-602Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Agree, Crabtree, Griffen, Vaught
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment that the plaintiff's breach of contract claim was barred by the five-year statute of limitations, rejecting arguments that the statute was tolled by partial payment or that federal law provided an alternative limitations period.

What This Ruling Means

# Phillips v. Union Pacific Railroad – What Workers Should Know **What Happened** Phillips filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Union Pacific Railroad. A breach of contract claim means Phillips believed the railroad violated an agreement they had made together. However, there was a significant delay between when the alleged breach occurred and when Phillips took legal action. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with Union Pacific Railroad. The judges ruled that Phillips' lawsuit came too late. Under the law, there is a five-year time limit to file a breach of contract claim. Phillips missed this deadline. The court rejected Phillips' arguments that the time limit should be extended due to partial payments from the railroad or that federal law allowed more time. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case is a reminder that workers cannot wait indefinitely to pursue contract disputes with their employers. If you believe an employer violated your employment contract—whether regarding pay, benefits, or working conditions—you should consult with someone about your rights sooner rather than later. Waiting too long can result in losing your legal claim entirely, regardless of whether the violation actually happened.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.