Skip to main content

Northwest Permastore Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

Or. Ct. App.February 14, 2001No. 40-98; CA A105840
Defendant WinNorthwest Permastore Systems, Inc.$2,524.29 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ceniceros, Haselton, Wollheim
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed BOLI's determination that the contractor violated prevailing wage rate laws and upheld civil penalties of $2,524.29. The court rejected the contractor's post-contract challenge to the labor classification, finding it barred by statute.

What This Ruling Means

**Northwest Permastore Systems, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries** Northwest Permastore Systems, a contractor, was accused of not paying workers the required prevailing wage rates on a public construction project. Prevailing wage laws require contractors on government-funded projects to pay workers wages that match the local market rates for similar work. The Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries (BOLI) investigated and found that the company had violated these wage requirements. BOLI ordered the company to pay $2,524.29 in penalties. The contractor challenged BOLI's decision in court, arguing that the workers had been misclassified and should have been paid under a different wage category. However, the court sided with BOLI and upheld the penalties. The court ruled that the contractor couldn't challenge the worker classification after the project was already completed, as state law prevented such late challenges. **What this means for workers:** This ruling reinforces that contractors must follow prevailing wage laws on public projects and pay the correct rates from the start. Workers on government-funded construction projects have strong legal protections, and employers can't avoid paying proper wages by arguing about job classifications after the work is done.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.