Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Ass'n of Journeymen, Local No. 120

6th CircuitDecember 15, 2000No. Nos. 98-3935, 98-3986, 98-3987 and 98-3988Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Batchelder, Keith, Siler
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The district court's finding of a pattern or practice of discrimination in the Union's referral system was reversed as clearly erroneous on remand, but the court affirmed the Union's civil contempt for violations of record-keeping and reporting requirements. The case was remanded for further proceedings regarding individual relief and the joinder of contractor defendants.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: EEOC v. United Association of Journeymen, Local No. 120 ## What Happened The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued a plumbers' union, claiming it discriminated against workers in how it referred people to jobs and retaliated against those who complained. ## What the Court Decided On appeal, the court reversed the finding that the union had a widespread pattern of discrimination in its job referral system. However, the court confirmed the union was guilty of civil contempt for failing to keep proper records and files as required by law. The court awarded $200,000 in damages and sent the case back for additional decisions about individual worker compensation and whether contractors should be included as defendants. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case shows that unions can face serious consequences for breaking record-keeping rules, even when discrimination claims face challenges. The ruling highlights that proper documentation matters significantly in discrimination cases. Workers should know that the EEOC will pursue unions that fail to follow legal requirements, though proving widespread discrimination patterns can be difficult. The case demonstrates ongoing accountability measures exist, though outcomes may be partial rather than complete victories.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.