Skip to main content

Security Farms v. General Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Union, Local 890 (In re General Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local 890)

9th CircuitSeptember 10, 2001No. No. 99-17030Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Schroeder, Tallman, Wallace
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's approval of Local 890's Chapter 11 reorganization plan, rejecting the creditors' arguments that the International union had an equity interest requiring new value contributions and that the collective bargaining agreement should be treated as a distributable asset.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This case involved a dispute between Security Farms (an employer) and General Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union Local 890. Based on the case name structure, this appears to be a labor relations matter that went through bankruptcy proceedings, as indicated by the "In re" designation. The specific details of the underlying employment dispute are not provided in the available information. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not specified in the available records. The case was filed in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in September 2001, but the final decision and any damages awarded are not reported. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Without knowing the specific outcome, it's difficult to determine the exact impact on workers. However, cases involving unions and employers that reach federal appeals courts often deal with important issues like collective bargaining rights, workplace safety, or union representation. These types of disputes can set precedents that affect how unions and employers negotiate and resolve conflicts. Workers should stay informed about such cases as they can influence labor relations and union rights in their industries. *Note: This summary is based on limited available information about the case.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.