Skip to main content

University of Great Falls v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitFebruary 12, 2002No. No. 00-1415Cited 60 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, Sentelle, Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court vacated the NLRB's decision and granted the University's petition for review, holding that the University of Great Falls is exempt from NLRB jurisdiction under the Catholic Bishop doctrine because it is a religiously operated institution with substantial religious character.

What This Ruling Means

**University of Great Falls v. National Labor Relations Board (2002)** This case involved a dispute over whether the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had the authority to regulate labor relations at the University of Great Falls, a Catholic institution in Montana. The university argued that as a religious organization, it should be exempt from federal labor law oversight. The NLRB disagreed and tried to assert its jurisdiction over the school's employment practices. The federal appeals court sided with the university. The court ruled that the University of Great Falls was exempt from NLRB jurisdiction under a legal principle called the "Catholic Bishop doctrine." This doctrine protects religiously operated institutions that have substantial religious character from federal labor oversight, even if they engage in secular activities like education. This ruling matters for workers because it limits their rights at religious institutions. Employees at universities, hospitals, and other organizations run by religious groups may have fewer protections under federal labor law. They cannot rely on the NLRB to help with union organizing, collective bargaining disputes, or unfair labor practice complaints if their employer qualifies as a religious institution. Workers at these organizations must look to state laws or other remedies for workplace protections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.