Skip to main content

Commonwealth Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitDecember 13, 2002No. No. 01-1401Cited 8 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Edwards, Ginsburg, Silberman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted CCI's petition for review, finding the collective bargaining agreement ambiguous and, upon examination of parol evidence, determined the agreement covered only the single airport job site, not multiple sites. The court reversed the NLRB's decision requiring CCI to provide information about work at other job sites.

What This Ruling Means

**Commonwealth Communications v. NLRB: Court Limits Employer's Duty to Share Workplace Information** This case involved a dispute over how much information an employer must share with a union. Commonwealth Communications, Inc. (CCI) had a collective bargaining agreement with a union representing workers at an airport job site. When the union asked CCI to provide information about work being done at other locations, CCI refused, arguing their contract only covered the single airport workplace. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) sided with the union and ordered CCI to hand over the information about other job sites. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the NLRB's decision. The court found that the collective bargaining agreement was unclear about whether it applied to multiple locations or just the airport site. After examining additional evidence, the court concluded the contract only covered the single airport workplace, so CCI was not required to share information about work at other locations. This ruling matters for workers because it limits when employers must provide information to unions. It shows that collective bargaining agreements need clear language about their scope, and unions may have less access to information about company operations outside their specific workplace covered by the contract.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.