Skip to main content

New York New York, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitDecember 24, 2002No. Nos. 01-1351 and 01-1352Cited 38 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Edwards, Randolph, Tatel
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the NLRB's orders, holding that contractor employees working on a casino's property do not have equivalent Section 7 organizing rights to the casino's own employees and that the casino validly restricted their union organizing activities on its premises.

What This Ruling Means

**New York New York Hotel & Casino vs. National Labor Relations Board** This case involved contract workers who were trying to organize a union at the New York New York Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. These workers were employed by outside contractors but performed their jobs on the casino's property. When the casino restricted their union organizing activities on its premises, the workers filed complaints. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) initially ruled in favor of the workers, saying the casino couldn't interfere with their organizing rights. However, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the NLRB's decision in December 2002. The court ruled that contract workers don't have the same union organizing rights on an employer's property as that employer's direct employees do. The court decided the casino had the legal right to restrict union organizing activities by contractor employees on its premises. This ruling matters for workers because it creates different levels of organizing rights depending on employment status. Contract workers and employees of subcontractors may face more restrictions when trying to organize unions at worksites they don't directly work for, even if they spend their days there. This can make union organizing more challenging for the growing number of contract and temporary workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.