Skip to main content

Louis v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

9th CircuitJuly 17, 2001No. No. 99-36092; D.C. No. CV-99-05195-FDBCited 1 time
Mixed ResultU.S. Department of Labor$1,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brunetti, Fisher, Fletcher
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Appellant prevailed on Count 3 Privacy Act claim against the Department of Labor, obtaining $1000 in damages for willful failure to maintain accurate records. Appellant's other counts regarding FECA review were affirmed or dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a meaningful summary of the Louis v. U.S. Department of Labor case based on the information provided. The excerpt section is empty, and crucial details are missing, including: - The specific dispute between Louis and the Department of Labor - What employment law issues were involved - The court's actual decision and reasoning - The outcome of the case To write an accurate and helpful summary for workers, I would need the actual court ruling text or a detailed description of the case facts, legal issues, and the court's decision. If you can provide the full case details or excerpt, I'd be happy to explain the ruling in plain English, focusing on what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters for workers' rights and protections. For employment law cases involving federal agencies like the Department of Labor, the issues often involve workplace safety regulations, wage and hour disputes, or discrimination claims, but without the specific facts, I cannot determine what this particular case addressed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.