Skip to main content

Folger Coffee Company v. International Union, et a

5th CircuitMarch 8, 2010No. 09-30399Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garwood, Wiener, Benavides
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's enforcement of an arbitration award in favor of the Union, rejecting Folger Coffee's appeal that the arbitrator exceeded her authority in ordering the company to reassign subcontracted cap dumping work back to bargaining unit employees.

What This Ruling Means

# Folger Coffee Company v. International Union (2010) ## What Happened Folger Coffee Company hired outside contractors to handle cap dumping work—a job previously done by its own unionized employees. The union filed a grievance arguing this violated their labor contract. An arbitrator (a neutral decision-maker) agreed with the union and ordered the company to give the work back to its union workers. Folger Coffee appealed, claiming the arbitrator had overstepped her authority. ## The Court's Decision The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the union. The court upheld the arbitrator's decision, requiring Folger Coffee to reassign the cap dumping work to its unionized employees rather than outside contractors. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling protects union workers' right to maintain their jobs. It shows that when a labor contract protects certain work for union employees, companies cannot simply outsource that work to cheaper contractors. Courts will enforce arbitrators' decisions that defend workers' contractual job protections, even when employers challenge those decisions on appeal.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.