Skip to main content

Int'l Brotherhood v. NLRB

11th CircuitNovember 13, 1997No. 95-3688
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court enforced part of the NLRB's order, agreeing that Zachry violated the NLRA by discharging Scott French and failing to recall Russell Myers due to union activities, but reversed on Mathew Jonjock's termination claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Workers Win Partial Victory in Retaliation Case** This case involved three workers at H.B. Zachry Company who claimed they were fired or not rehired because of their union activities. Scott French said he was discharged for supporting the union, Russell Myers claimed the company failed to bring him back to work due to his union involvement, and Mathew Jonjock also alleged he was terminated for union activities. The court reached a split decision. It agreed with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that the company illegally fired Scott French and wrongfully failed to recall Russell Myers because of their union activities, which violates federal labor law. However, the court disagreed with the NLRB's finding about Mathew Jonjock's case and ruled that his termination was not illegal retaliation. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that employees have the right to support unions without fear of being fired or punished by their employers. When companies retaliate against workers for union activities, they break federal law and can be ordered to reinstate employees. However, the mixed outcome also shows that workers must be able to prove their union activities were the real reason for their termination, as each case is evaluated on its specific facts.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.