Skip to main content

In re Colgate-Palmolive Co. Erisa Litigation

S.D.N.Y.July 8, 2014No. Master File No. 07-cv-9515Cited 26 times
SettlementColgate-Palmolive Company$45,900,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Schofield
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

erisa

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court approved $45.9 million ERISA class action settlement and awarded class counsel 25% ($11,475,000) in attorneys' fees plus $591,011.17 in costs and $5,000 incentive awards to each named plaintiff for claims that the Colgate-Palmolive pension plan miscalculated benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Thousands of Colgate-Palmolive employees and retirees sued the company over pension benefit miscalculations. The lawsuit claimed that Colgate-Palmolive made errors when calculating retirement benefits under their employee pension plan, which is governed by federal ERISA laws. These mistakes affected 8,612 current and former workers who were receiving incorrect pension payments - likely lower amounts than they were entitled to receive. **What the Court Decided** A federal court in New York approved a $45.9 million class action settlement in July 2014. This means Colgate-Palmolive agreed to pay this amount to resolve the pension miscalculation dispute without admitting wrongdoing. The settlement money will be distributed among the affected workers to correct their pension benefits. The lawyers who represented the workers received $11.475 million in fees plus costs. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employees can successfully challenge pension benefit errors through group lawsuits. When companies miscalculate retirement benefits, workers have legal protections under ERISA that allow them to seek corrections and compensation. The substantial settlement demonstrates that courts take pension calculation errors seriously and will hold employers accountable for properly managing employee retirement benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.