Skip to main content

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rent-A-Center East, Inc.

C.D. Ill.September 8, 2017No. Case No. 16-CV-2222Cited 4 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bruce
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court denied the employer's motion for summary judgment, allowing the transgender discrimination claim to proceed to trial, but also denied the EEOC's motion for partial summary judgment on the failure-to-mitigate affirmative defense, leaving both issues for the jury to decide.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against Rent-A-Center East, Inc., alleging the company engaged in employment discrimination. While the specific details of the discrimination claims aren't provided in the available information, the EEOC brought the case on behalf of workers who believed they were treated unfairly based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or disability. **What the Court Decided** Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement in 2017. Under this settlement, Rent-A-Center agreed to pay monetary compensation to affected workers and implement changes to prevent future discrimination. The company also agreed to take specific remedial measures to address the discriminatory practices that led to the lawsuit. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that the EEOC actively investigates and pursues discrimination claims against employers, even large national companies like Rent-A-Center. When workers file discrimination complaints with the EEOC, the agency may take legal action on their behalf, potentially leading to financial compensation and workplace improvements. The settlement demonstrates that companies can be held accountable for discriminatory practices and forced to change their policies to protect employees' rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.