Skip to main content

Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

D. Del.February 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16-358-RGACited 10 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Andrews
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's willful patent infringement claim, allowing the claim to proceed to further litigation.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a patent dispute between two scientific equipment companies, Bio-Rad Laboratories and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Bio-Rad accused Thermo Fisher of intentionally stealing their patented technology and using it without permission. Thermo Fisher tried to get the lawsuit thrown out early by filing a motion to dismiss, arguing that Bio-Rad's claims weren't strong enough to proceed to trial. **What the Court Decided** The court rejected Thermo Fisher's attempt to dismiss the case. The judge found that Bio-Rad had presented enough evidence to suggest that Thermo Fisher may have willfully infringed on their patents, meaning they potentially stole the technology on purpose rather than by accident. This allowed the lawsuit to move forward to the next stages of litigation. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this appears to be primarily a business dispute between companies, patent cases can affect workers when they involve accusations of employees taking trade secrets or technology from one employer to another. Workers should understand that moving between competing companies with proprietary knowledge can lead to legal complications, and they may need to be careful about what information they use in new positions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.