No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Secretary of Labor prevailed in establishing that defendant SPF and Rivera violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay minimum wage and overtime; the court found Rivera was an employer liable for back wages and liquidated damages, though De Jesús was dismissed.
Acosta v. Special Police Force Corp.
What Happened
The Secretary of Labor sued Special Police Force Corp. and its owner Rivera, claiming the company failed to pay workers the required minimum wage and overtime pay in violation of federal law.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the Secretary of Labor. The judge found that Special Police Force Corp. and Rivera violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by not paying workers properly. Rivera was held personally responsible as an employer and ordered to pay back wages and additional damages to affected workers. Another defendant, De Jesús, was dismissed from the case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot skip paying minimum wage or overtime without facing consequences. It also shows that company owners can be held personally accountable for wage violations—they cannot hide behind the company to avoid responsibility. Workers who believe they haven't been paid properly have legal protection and can seek recovery through the Department of Labor.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.