Skip to main content

United States ex rel. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local Union No. 98 v. Farfield Co.

E.D. Pa.May 2, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION No. 09-4230Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Kearney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court denied the union's False Claims Act case against the electrical contractor, finding the matter nonjusticiable without Department of Labor determination on worker misclassification, and the Department's declination to investigate rendered the primary jurisdiction doctrine applicable, dismissing the case.

What This Ruling Means

# Plain English Summary: Electrical Workers Union v. Farfield Company **What Happened** The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 98 sued the Farfield Company, an electrical contractor, claiming wage theft. The union alleged the company misclassified workers in a way that violated federal law and defrauded the government on projects it worked on. **What the Court Decided** In May 2019, the court dismissed the case. The judge ruled that the matter couldn't proceed without first having the U.S. Department of Labor investigate and make a determination about whether workers were truly misclassified. Since the Department of Labor had already declined to investigate the issue, the court found it didn't have authority to hear the case at that time. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling highlights an important hurdle for workers seeking justice through the courts: sometimes disputes must first be reviewed by government agencies like the Department of Labor before courts can act. If those agencies decline to investigate, workers may find their legal options limited, even when they believe they've been treated unfairly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.