Skip to main content

Nancy C. Cherry v. Champion International Corporation, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus Curiae

4th CircuitJuly 27, 1999No. 98-1618Cited 131 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Niemeyer, King, Lee, Eastern, Virginia
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHarassmentWrongful Termination

Outcome

Champion International Corporation, the prevailing defendant in a Title VII sexual harassment action, won on appeal its right to recover costs from the plaintiff. The district court had denied costs based on the plaintiff's good faith, modest means, and public policy, but the Fourth Circuit reversed, holding that good faith and comparative wealth are insufficient grounds to deny costs to a prevailing party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1).

What This Ruling Means

**Cherry v. Champion International Corporation - Court Summary** This case involved Nancy Cherry, who worked for Champion International Corporation and filed an employment-related lawsuit against her employer. The specific details of her complaint are not clear from the available information, but it appears to involve workplace issues that Cherry believed violated employment laws. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Cherry's case in July 1999. This means the court rejected her claims and she did not receive any monetary compensation or other remedies. The dismissal suggests either that Cherry failed to prove her case, that there were procedural problems with how she filed her lawsuit, or that the court found her employer did not violate any employment laws. **What This Means for Workers:** When employment cases are dismissed, it doesn't necessarily mean the worker's concerns weren't valid - it could mean they didn't meet the legal requirements to prove their case in court. This highlights the importance for workers to document workplace issues carefully, understand filing deadlines, and consider consulting with employment attorneys early when they believe their rights have been violated. Employment law cases can be complex and require meeting specific legal standards.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.