Skip to main content

Robert Webb v. Ada County

9th CircuitOctober 29, 1999No. 97-35990Cited 16 times
Mixed ResultAda County$224,308 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Appellate court affirmed denial of attorney's fees for Doke motion where plaintiff was not ultimately successful, but remanded for recalculation of fees on other postjudgment matters to apply PLRA limitations that district court failed to apply.

What This Ruling Means

**Webb v. Ada County: Employment Discrimination Case** Robert Webb sued Ada County claiming he was wrongfully terminated from his job in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The case involved Webb arguing that the county fired him because of his disability, which would be illegal discrimination. The court ruled in favor of Webb on his main claim, awarding him $224,308 in damages for the wrongful termination. However, the case had a mixed outcome regarding legal fees. The appeals court denied Webb's request for attorney's fees related to one specific legal motion (called a "Doke motion") because he wasn't ultimately successful on that particular issue. The court did send the case back to the lower court to recalculate other attorney's fees, requiring them to apply certain legal limitations they had previously missed. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully fight back against disability discrimination and win significant financial compensation. However, it also demonstrates that even when workers win their main case, they might not recover all their legal costs, especially for unsuccessful parts of their lawsuit. Workers should understand that employment discrimination cases can be complex, with courts examining each legal issue separately when determining what compensation is appropriate.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.