Skip to main content

Gary A. Davolt v. The Executive Committee of O'Reilly Automotive, as Trustee and Plan Administrator of the O'Reilly Automotive Employee Health Plan

8th CircuitMarch 15, 2000No. 99-2381Cited 30 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Arnold, Loken, Hansen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment for the employee and held that the employer properly denied coverage for vascular disease surgery as a preexisting condition excluded under the plan's terms, as the condition was diagnosed and treated prior to and during the six-month waiting period.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Gary Davolt, an employee at O'Reilly Automotive, needed surgery for vascular disease and expected his company health insurance to cover it. However, O'Reilly's health plan denied coverage, claiming the condition was a "preexisting condition" that wasn't covered under the plan's rules. Davolt had been diagnosed and received treatment for this vascular condition before joining the company and during his first six months of employment. He sued the company, arguing they should pay for his surgery. **What the Court Decided** The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with O'Reilly Automotive. The court ruled that the company was right to deny coverage because Davolt's vascular disease qualified as a preexisting condition under the health plan's specific terms. Since he had been diagnosed and treated for this condition before and during the plan's six-month waiting period, the exclusion applied. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the importance of carefully reading health insurance plan details, especially preexisting condition clauses. Workers should understand that health plans can legally exclude coverage for medical conditions that existed before employment or during waiting periods. When changing jobs, employees should review their new health benefits thoroughly and consider how preexisting conditions might affect their coverage.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.