Skip to main content

William Kinslow v. American Postal Workers Union, Chicago Local

7th CircuitAugust 2, 2000No. 99-2293Cited 13 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Posner, Manion, Kanne
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWhistleblower

Outcome

Kinslow prevailed on retaliation and access to financial records claims under the LMRDA. The court affirmed awards of punitive damages, attorney's fees, reinstatement, and injunctive relief, but vacated and remanded the overtime pay award for more specific findings.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Member Wins Retaliation Case After Requesting Financial Records** William Kinslow, a member of the American Postal Workers Union in Chicago, sued his own union for retaliation. Kinslow had requested access to the union's financial records, which union members have a legal right to see. After making this request, the union allegedly took revenge against him, treating him unfairly because he asked to see how the union was spending members' money. The court ruled in Kinslow's favor, finding that the union had indeed retaliated against him for exercising his legal rights. The judge ordered the union to pay $150,001 in damages, reinstate Kinslow, cover his attorney's fees, and pay additional punitive damages to punish the union's behavior. The court also issued an injunction to prevent future retaliation. However, the court sent one part of the case back to the lower court to clarify findings about overtime pay. This case is important for workers because it shows that union members have strong legal protections when requesting financial information from their unions. If a union retaliates against members for asking legitimate questions about finances, courts will hold the union accountable and provide meaningful remedies to the wronged member.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.