Skip to main content

Byron Ingram v. Martin Marietta Long Term Disability Income Plan for Salaried Employees of Transferred Ge Operations, an Erisa Plan

9th CircuitApril 4, 2001No. 99-55581Cited 61 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Nelson, Fletcher, Reed
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Remanded by 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

Related Laws

erisa

Outcome

The 9th Circuit remanded the case for further proceedings regarding the denial of long-term disability benefits under the ERISA plan, likely involving review of the plan administrator's decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Ruling: Ingram v. Martin Marietta Long Term Disability Plan** Byron Ingram filed a lawsuit against his employer's long-term disability insurance plan after his claim for benefits was denied. Ingram worked for operations that had been transferred from General Electric to Martin Marietta, and when he became disabled and unable to work, he applied for long-term disability benefits through his employer's plan. The plan administrator rejected his claim, so Ingram took the case to federal court. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decided to send the case back to a lower court for additional review. Rather than making a final ruling on whether Ingram deserved benefits, the appeals court determined that more proceedings were needed to properly examine how the plan administrator made its decision to deny Ingram's claim. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that employees have the right to challenge disability benefit denials in court, even when dealing with employer-sponsored plans governed by federal ERISA law. When plan administrators deny claims, courts can step in to review those decisions and ensure they were made fairly and according to plan rules. Workers facing similar benefit denials shouldn't give up after an initial rejection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.