Skip to main content

King Soopers, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

8th CircuitJune 22, 2001No. 00-3332, 00-3753Cited 8 times
Plaintiff WinKing Soopers, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hansen, Bye, Melloy
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the NLRB's order holding that King Soopers violated the National Labor Relations Act by withdrawing union recognition and refusing to apply collective-bargaining agreements to its relocated Broomfield store, and by denying an employee's contractual transfer rights.

What This Ruling Means

I apologize, but I cannot provide a summary of this court ruling because the excerpt you've provided doesn't contain the actual content of the case. The information shows only basic case details (parties, court, date) but no description of what the dispute was about, what legal issues were involved, or what the court decided. To write an accurate plain-English summary for workers, I would need the actual court opinion or at least a substantial excerpt that explains: - The facts of the case (what happened between King Soopers and the NLRB) - The legal dispute that needed to be resolved - The court's reasoning and decision - Any specific rulings or holdings If you can provide the actual text of the court ruling or a more detailed excerpt, I'd be happy to translate it into clear, accessible language that explains what happened, what the court decided, and why it matters for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.