Skip to main content

Stephen Simon v. Allstate Employee Group Medical Plan and Rodney T. Daniels

7th CircuitSeptember 21, 2001No. 00-3120Cited 22 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bauer, Coffey, Williams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The district court's dismissal of Simon's ERISA and state law claims was affirmed on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds. Simon lacked standing as a third-party claim assignee who was not a healthcare provider.

What This Ruling Means

I notice that the case excerpt you provided is empty, which means I don't have the actual court ruling content to summarize. Without the court's decision and reasoning, I cannot provide an accurate summary of what happened in Stephen Simon v. Allstate Employee Group Medical Plan and Rodney T. Daniels. To write a proper summary for workers, I would need: - The facts of the dispute (what Mr. Simon was claiming) - The court's decision and reasoning - The legal issues involved The case name suggests this involved a dispute with Allstate's employee medical plan, but without the actual ruling text, I cannot explain what specific issue was at stake, how the court ruled, or what it means for workers. If you could provide the actual court decision excerpt or more details about the case, I'd be happy to write a clear, plain-English summary that explains the dispute, outcome, and significance for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.