Skip to main content

Parker Johnston v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Matson Terminals, Inc., Self-Insured Employer

9th CircuitFebruary 22, 2002No. 01-70201Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fletcher, McKEOWN, Tallman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the Benefits Review Board's decision that Johnston's post-injury wages did not require inflation adjustment under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, holding that actual wages at the same rate fairly represent wage-earning capacity when the claimant returns to the same job.

What This Ruling Means

# Parker Johnston v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs **What Happened** Parker Johnston, a worker at Matson Terminals, was injured on the job. After his injury, he returned to work in the same position but at the same wage rate he earned before getting hurt. Johnston argued that his workers' compensation benefits should be adjusted for inflation to reflect how his wage-earning ability had declined compared to what he might have earned if he hadn't been injured. **The Court's Decision** The appeals court ruled against Johnston. The court decided that when an injured worker returns to the same job at the same pay rate, no wage adjustment is necessary. The actual wages he was earning fairly represented his ability to earn money, even though inflation had occurred. **Why This Matters** This ruling means injured workers who go back to their previous jobs at the previous pay rates generally cannot demand inflation adjustments to their workers' compensation benefits. The court treated returning to the same position as proof that the worker could still earn adequately, regardless of rising costs over time.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.