Skip to main content

Ernest Scott v. Mason Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

4th CircuitMay 2, 2002No. 99-1495Cited 22 times
Plaintiff WinMason Coal Company
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wilkinson, Widener, Spencer, Eastern, Virginia
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fourth Circuit reversed and remanded the Benefits Review Board's decision denying black lung benefits, finding that the ALJ erred by failing to consider a reasoned medical opinion regarding total disability and improperly relying on doctors who did not diagnose pneumoconiosis. The court ordered benefits to be awarded to Scott.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, this appears to be a workers' compensation case involving Ernest Scott and Mason Coal Company that was heard by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2002. **What happened:** Ernest Scott, likely a coal miner, had a dispute with Mason Coal Company that involved the federal Office of Workers' Compensation Programs. This suggests Scott was seeking workers' compensation benefits, possibly for a work-related injury or illness, and there was disagreement about whether he was entitled to those benefits. **What the court decided:** Unfortunately, the outcome of this case is not specified in the available information, so we cannot determine how the court ruled on Scott's claim. **Why this matters for workers:** Workers' compensation cases in the coal mining industry are particularly important because mining is dangerous work with high rates of injury and occupational illness. These cases help establish precedents for when workers can receive benefits for workplace injuries, medical treatment, and lost wages. The involvement of federal agencies shows that coal miners have additional protections under federal law beyond typical state workers' compensation systems. Without more details about the specific ruling, workers should consult with attorneys familiar with workers' compensation law for guidance on similar situations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.